skip navigational linksDOL Seal - Link to DOL Home Page
Photos representing the workforce - Digital Imagery© copyright 2001 PhotoDisc, Inc.
www.dol.gov/ebsa
December 5, 2008    DOL > EBSA > Newsroom > Speeches and Testimony   

Remarks to the 2002 Annual Conference on Employee Disability, Health, and Productivity

Assistant Secretary Ann L. Combs
October 23, 2002

Introduction

Thank you, Helen, for that kind introduction. I appreciate the opportunity to talk to the Washington Business Group on Health. I am pleased to be with you today.

First, let me commend WBGH for the fine job you do providing a voice for employers dedicated to finding innovative solutions to the nation’s health care problems.

You are truly leaders in the national effort to increase worker productivity through access to quality, affordable health care coverage and innovative disability management programs.

Today, I want to discuss our common goal of preserving health care quality and access while also controlling costs. Clearly, plan sponsors face obstacles pursuing both quality and value.

Maintaining health care coverage is especially difficult during these economically challenging times. And, there are many factors that drive up the cost of health-care coverage that are out of your control.

A recent Kaiser Family Foundation study cited increases in costs for prescription drugs, hospital services, and medical technology as significant contributors to the double-digit medical inflation we face today.

In addition, the enormous cost driver of state and federal regulation increases every year. Overly burdensome regulations threaten to stifle access to affordable health care coverage by driving up costs.

Of course, you understand better than anyone that workers who have quality health care coverage, when they or their families need it, are healthier, happier -- and more productive. And, for many years, increased worker productivity has been the foundation of our economic strength and resilience.

The Bush Administration is committed to achieving the objectives of access, quality and affordability in the policies we support and implement for the nation.

Like you, we are dedicated to strengthening America’s private employer-based health insurance system. This system preserves freedom and rewards the innovations that provide the best possible health care at the best possible price.

But the tremendous potential of our system to innovate is threatened when patients have limited choices about their health care coverage and providers, and plans don’t compete.

For this reason, the President strongly believes that we must take action to strengthen and improve the health care coverage options available to Americans. The administration has proposed several innovative solutions, which I’d like to briefly discuss.

Back to Top

Health Care Costs

Rising health care costs are a major concern on the minds of employers everywhere.

According to a study just released by Hewitt Associates, the cost of health benefit plans at large companies will rise an average of 15.4 percent next year. This is on top of the 13.7 percent increase recorded this year, and 11% in 2001. According to the study, and I quote, “unless there is fundamental change in how health care is delivered, costs will double in the next five years.”

These cost increases are cutting into companies’ ability to compete and create jobs, and causing many employees to pay more for their share of insurance premiums. As a result, many employers are considering or implementing health plans that try to control costs through defined contribution models. The hope is that these models will lead to more efficient health care usage by making employees personally responsible for more of their health care spending.

Predictably, rising costs also are increasing the number of uninsured Americans. According to the recent Census Report, the number of people without health insurance rose 1.4 million in 2001, to 41.2 million. This translates into an estimated 14.6 percent of the population that had no health insurance coverage during all of 2001. This is an increase from 14.2 percent in 2000.

Clearly, the employer-based health insurance system is under stress. Our private sector employment-based system continues to deliver the highest quality healthcare in the world. But we must work together to improve access to health care if our private sector system is to survive. The President has several proposals to make better, more affordable coverage options available through employers.

Back to Top

Health Reimbursement Arrangements

The latest example of private sector innovation is the development of the health reimbursement arrangement (HRA). As you know, the Treasury Department recently issued a new revenue ruling clarifying the tax treatment of HRAs and clearing the way for them to be adopted more broadly. Helen, your leadership and this organization’s influence was instrumental in prompting Secretary O’Neill to make this guidance a reality.

We strongly support the ruling and applaud Treasury’s foresight in having it published in a timely fashion. We look forward to working with you to facilitate the development of other innovative designs to help control costs by making the consumer a true participant in the financing of healthcare.

Back to Top

Flexible Spending Accounts

The President also supports improvements in Flexible Spending Accounts to make them work more effectively - notably by modifying the notorious use-it-or-lose-it rule.

Under our proposal, employees could roll over as much as $500 in unspent health care contributions to an FSA for use in the following year or to put into a 401(k) plan for retirement.

And to make it easier to pay for retiree medical expenses, this amount could also be used for health expenses in retirement.

I know that easing the restrictions on FSAs is one of your top legislative priorities. We are grateful for your continuing grassroots efforts in support of the Administration’s proposal.

Back to Top

Medical Savings Accounts

The President also has proposed several improvements to Medical Savings Accounts in an effort to make them an attractive insurance option for both employers and employees. MSAs give individuals greater control over their health care spending and make out-of-pocket spending on healthcare more affordable. The proposals would allow a broader array of insurance products to be purchased through MSAs, encourage preventive health services, and allow employees to make their out-of-pocket payments with pretax dollars.

Together the President’s proposals to expand MSAs, improve FSAs and promote HRAs would provide an additional $15 billion in tax benefits to support employment-based health care.

Back to Top

Health Care Tax Credits

For Americans without employer-based health care coverage, the President has proposed $89 billion in new health credits to make private health insurance more affordable for low- and middle-income American families. The refundable tax credits would be worth up to $1000 for individuals and $3000 for families, and would be available when people need them to pay their insurance premiums.

The credits will enable 6 million Americans who would otherwise be uninsured during a year to get coverage, and will help many more who are struggling to pay for their own health insurance with little or no government help.

The President signed into law, as part of the Trade Promotion Authority Act, legislation to provide $15 billion in health tax credits to assist workers who have lost their jobs. The credits would pay 65 percent of the cost of health care coverage and would assist over 4 million displaced workers. The two groups eligible for this subsidy are workers dislocated due to the impact of trade, and individuals over the age of 55 who are receiving an annuity from the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation.

I am aware of your concerns about potential increases in COBRA costs if affected workers elect to use their tax credits to purchase COBRA. I think this legislation may have some other unintended consequences as well - particularly for the PBGC. We need to be careful in implementing the statute and monitor its effects carefully.

Back to Top

Association Health Plans

The President also supports legislation that provides for the creation of Association Health Plans (AHPs). The Department of Labor would have primary responsibility for ensuring that AHPs enable small businesses to provide better and more affordable health insurance options for their employees.

In support of this initiative, on September 13, Secretary Chao released an AHP report which makes the case that the legislation would make quality health insurance more affordable and accessible for millions of small business owners and their employees. AHPs would allow members of associations to pool together to offer health insurance to their employees.

Under uniform federal standards, AHPs would enable small employers to achieve greater purchasing power, administrative efficiencies, and flexibility in benefit design. These are the same advantages long available to large businesses.

Small businesses are far less likely than larger businesses to offer health benefits. In 1999 only 47 percent of firms with fewer than 50 employees offered health benefits compared with 97 percent of larger firms. Some of the most rapid increases in health insurance premiums in the last few years have occurred in small businesses.

So, why are AHPs important to the large companies in WBGH?

Any initiative such as AHPs that could reduce the number of uninsured will be good in the long run for WBGH’s companies and for the health care system in general.

To the extent that AHPs are successful in reducing the number of uninsured who now receive uncompensated care, AHPs will reduce health care costs. As you know, the costs borne by those with insurance are often inflated through the invisible tax of the “cost shift.”

Secondly, to the extent that AHPs are successful in bringing in new, healthy members who pay into the premium pool, AHPs may exert downward pressure on health care inflation.

We believe that all these alphabetized initiatives - HRAs, FSAs, MSAs and AHPs -- advance our goal to make it easier for employers to adopt health plans with patient-directed features, and to give employees more choice and greater control over their health care coverage.

Back to Top

Medicare/Retiree Health Care

Now, a few words about Medicare and retiree health issues.

The rapidly rising cost of prescription drugs is of increasing concern to large employers. One of the largest flaws in Medicare coverage today is its failure to cover outpatient prescription drugs. Approximately 98 percent of private health insurance plans offer a prescription drug benefit or a cap on out-of-pocket expenses as an integral part of the benefit package. Drugs can often be cost-effective therapies preventing the need for more expensive hospitalizations or other intensive therapies.

Coupled with a systematic effort to change the outmoded Medicare program, the Administration is committed to urgently needed Medicare modernization, including providing for an integrated prescription drug plan.

Although we have not succeeded in passing legislation, on October 21, President Bush announced a new rule to lower prescription drug costs by improving access to generic drugs. The proposed rule is expected to lead to savings in drug costs of over $3 billion per year for consumers.

Back to Top

Retiree Health

In addition to tackling Medicare reform, I expect the next Congress to begin to grapple with the issue of retiree health. I know many of you have been struggling with increased costs at rates never seen before. Many of you have scaled back your plans or are considering substantial design changes.

A 2001 survey by Mercer Human Resource Consulting reports that only 30 percent of large employers with 500 or more employees offer retiree health benefits. In 1993, 46% of companies offered retiree health. For those employers with between 10 and 499 employees, only eight percent offered retiree health benefits.

Health inflation data helps explain the drop in coverage. Insurance coverage for early retirees rose 12% in 2001, and cost over $6600 per retiree. With the requirements of FAS 106, accounting for retiree health benefits is not a pretty picture on the balance sheet. The lack of favorable tax treatment for pre-funding, and the uncertainty caused by the Erie County case only adds to the disincentives to offer retiree health. Frankly, it’s a credit to your companies that you continue to struggle to provide this benefit when every card in the deck is stacked against you.

Together we need to begin discussing whether there are ways to make pre-funding of liabilities a reality.

Back to Top

Medical Liability Reform

Let me take a moment to talk about one of the major drivers of increasing health care costs - the medical liability system -- and what the Administration proposes to do about it.

A major contributor to rising health care costs is a medical liability system that is broken. Frivolous lawsuits, or the threat of them, are driving doctors out of certain specialties because they can’t afford to defend themselves. Doctors, hospitals and managed care companies settle cases even though they have not committed a medical error.

And the unpredictability of our liability system means that even frivolous cases carry the risk of enormous verdicts. The fear of even baseless lawsuits causes good doctors to order excessive tests and procedures and treatments. If a doctor thinks he or she might be sued, he does everything possible to protect himself. The costs of defensive medicine are passed on to employees and employers - and worse may threaten patient health.

Towers Perrin estimated that frivolous lawsuits added $179 billion to health care costs in 2000. We must, of course, protect any injured patient's right to a fair trial and fair compensation, including full compensation for economic damages. At the same time, we must prevent excessive awards that drive up costs, encourage frivolous lawsuits, and promote drawn-out legal proceedings.

This is why the President has proposed a reasonable federal limit of $250,000 on non-economic damages awarded in medical liability lawsuits, and a reasonable limit on punitive damages. Such a reform would help control health care inflation and reduce skyrocketing employer costs.

Back to Top

Compliance Assistance

Before I close, I do want mention a priority of Secretary Chao’s: compliance assistance. She has stressed the need for PWBA to educate and assist employers, plan officials, service providers and others in achieving and maintaining compliance with ERISA.

I also want to mention a new outreach initiative to improve the understanding of and compliance with HIPAA, mental health parity, the Mothers’ and Newborns’ Act, and WHCRA. As some of you may know, PWBA reviewed almost 1300 group health plans in 2001 for compliance with Part 7.

Our cooperative process identified common problems and misunderstandings. We plan to publish the results of our review in the next few weeks, at which time we will also announce three new compliance assistance strategies to help plan sponsors and service providers comply with these health laws.

First, PWBA will issue three new publications, including a self-audit checklist and tips to help plans avoid common errors. Second, the agency will dedicate a section of our website exclusively to the new health laws-including Frequently Asked Questions and other guidance.

PWBA also will participate in workshops around the country where trained staff will meet with plan administrators, employers, attorneys, consultants and service providers to discuss the health laws and compliance issues.

Back to Top

Conclusion

Let me close by saying that we share the commitment to preserving and strengthening the quality of our health care system while also increasing access to coverage and care for all Americans.

And I know that you are striving, every day, to achieve the dual objectives of quality and affordability. Your efforts are critical to the continued success of the private health care system in our country.

At the end of the day, we want as many Americans as possible to have health insurance coverage. We want them to be satisfied with that coverage and confident that it will be there when they need it. And obviously, we want it to be affordable to both the employer and employee.

The challenge for the Administration, the Congress and the WBGH is to strengthen employers’ ability to deliver the benefits that workers depend upon - but to do it in a way that does not diminish your willingness to voluntarily offer plans for workers, retirees and their families.

About EBSA
Laws & Regulations
Technical Guidance
Compliance Assistance

Consumer Information

FAQs
Contact Us



Phone Numbers